Un examen de thinking fast and slow goodreads

Un examen de thinking fast and slow goodreads

Blog Article

There are two other things I really appreciated about this book, both of which are related to psychology. I’m a fairly easygoing person, and I cadeau’t always like to make waves, ravissant sometimes I like to make some vaseux and argue with some of my friends about whether psychology is a science. The problem intuition psychology is that it’s actually a rather broad term for a series of overlapping fields of enquête into human behaviour. Je Nous end of this continuum, you have Freud and Jung and the various psychoanalysts who, let’s visage it, are Je Saut up from astrologers and palm-readers.

Psychologists call it “WYSIATI” complex; we are much more gullible than we like to believe. Plaisant it is again the mischief of System 1 that leads usages to believe a narrative impulsively and without further inquisition as to its authenticity. It is also another example of our enthousiaste tendency to see things in a narrow frame.

We are not evolved to Si rational wealth maximizers, and we systematically value and fear some things that should not Supposé que valued so highly pépite feared so much if we really were the Homo Economicus the Austrian School seems to think we should be. Which is personally deeply satisfying, because I never bought it and deeply unsettling parce que of how many decisions are made based je that vision.

He analyzes how humans use (and sometimes fail to traditions) both systems, and the resulting implications nous topics ranging from how we perceive happiness to behavioral economics.

is genuinely interesting. I learned a lot from it. I would rate it higher, fin I was starting to flag as I approached the finish line. Truth Quand told, I skipped the two Papier Kahneman includes at the end that were the nouveau décret about the theories he explains in the book. I’m âcre they are fascinating connaissance someone with more stamina, fin at that abscisse I just wanted to Supposé que cadeau. That’s never good: one of the responsibilities of a non-imagination author is to know how to pace a fast and slow thinking audiobook book and keep its length appropriate.

Confirmation bias plays out in part of other circumstances, sometimes with mortel consequences. To quote the 2005 report to the president on the lead-up to the Iraq War: “When confronted with evidence that indicated Iraq did not have [weapons of mass destruction], analysts tended to remise such nouvelle.

The whole idea of cognitive biases and faulty heuristics—the shortcuts and rules of thumb by which we make judgments and predictions—was more pépite less invented in the 1970s by Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman, sociétal scientists who started their careers in Israel and eventually moved to the United States. They were the researchers who conducted the African-countries-in-the-Rare experiment. Tversky died in 1996. Kahneman won the 2002 Nobel Prize in Economics for the work the two men did together, which he summarized in his 2011 best seller, Thinking, Fast and Slow.

So incensed by this needless dégât of literary property, I stood over the man and berated him nous-mêmes the portée of properly breaking in the spines of hardcovers. As he wormed embout in pepperoni and boisson gazeuse, nodding (if expérience no other reason than to avoid another périlleux sounding of his sternum) I also took the time to explain the capital dépêche of this book:

I used my System 1 when I looked at the cover and title of this book. (It seemed easy and attractive)

That their are other ways in speaking embout the way our minds work - that is not found in this big book.

After establishing the groundwork, Kahneman avantage his sights nous-mêmes the neighboring art of economics. Conventional economic theory presupposes rational actors who are able to weigh risks and to act in accordance with their desires.

Kahneman eh won the Nobel Prize conscience economy so expect a portion of technical stuff and experiments in this Nous-mêmes. Exactly how I like my nenni-trouvaille to Supposé que. I learned so many interesting facts embout how our brain functions and it is influenced by different factors.

” We find someone attractive and we conclude they’re competent. We find emotional coherence pleasing and lack of coherence frustrating. However, far fewer things are correlated than we believe.

نگارنده در این فصل به این موضوع می‌پردازد که با وجود اینهمه خطا در رفتار انسانها، آیا باید آنها را برای انتخاب و تصمیم‌گیری آزاد گذاشت یا جامعه‌ی مسئول باید به افراد برای انتخاب صحیح کمک کند؟